Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Odeku, K. O.
dc.contributor.author Tshikovhi, Rotondwa Happy
dc.date.accessioned 2015-08-12T12:35:17Z
dc.date.available 2015-08-12T12:35:17Z
dc.date.issued 2014
dc.date.submitted 2014
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10386/1236
dc.description Thesis (LLM. (Labour Law)) --University of Limpopo, 2014 en_US
dc.description.abstract This research focuses on the application of the double jeopardy principle in labour law, section 188(1)(a (b) of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995, (herein the LRA) which provides that the dismissal is unfair if the employer fails to prove that the reason for the dismissal is fair and was effected in accordance with a fair procedure. The first point which I would explain is the meaning of double jeopardy and whether it is applicable in labour law. The research articulates that the double jeopardy principle applies to labour law and enumerates ways it can be applied. The South African courts, in particular, the Labour Court and the Labour Appeal Court have delivered several judgements on the double jeopardy principle. These cases will be critically discussed in detail. Comparison will be made with foreign labour law jurisprudence on the double jeopardy principle, particularly in Australia and the United States of America. en_US
dc.format.extent vii, 54 leaves en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher University of Limpopo en_US
dc.relation.requires Adobe Acrobat Reader, vesion 8 en_US
dc.subject Double jeopardy principle en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Double jeopardy -- South Africa en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Sentences (Criminal procedure) -- South Africa en_US
dc.title The law relating to double jeopardy in labour law en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ULSpace


Browse

My Account